I guess here Photoshop looked at my frogs in each picture, and like it would do in a family portrait, it chose the best faces. Overall, both images are good, but I think the Helicon Focus image is a bit better. I like the colors better, the purple flowers on the left are much better, and the yellow center of the flowers on the right are brighter and sharper. The Helicon Focus in general is brighter and seems sharper to me. It's like magic, in the end you get a final picture where your important elements are in focus. Overall, I prefer the Helicon Focus image. And that is exactly what it does: it looks at the images and defines what is most important on each of them. You can do this by clicking on the top layer and then Shift-clicking on the. The second part of the operation can be accessed under the Edit menu, and is called Auto-Blend layers. I use Auto because Photoshop is intelligent and will place my three images with the frogs on top of each other, and align the two remaining images under them, creating my vertical panorama.
Get answers to your questions in our photography forums. So, I absolutely need to use this function. Expert news, reviews and videos of the latest digital cameras, lenses, accessories, and phones.
In my case, as I took the pictures with the camera in my hand. CombineZ5 Does a very similar job to Helicon Focus (below) but is free. for focus stacking and related procedures, such Helicon Focus.
#PHOTOACUTE VS HELICON FOCUS SOFTWARE#
When you focus stack images, all the images are usually taken with the exact same framing, but even so it is wise to use the Auto-Align Layers function in Photoshop (go to the Edit menu and you'll find it). Maybe you are a casual hobby shooter or just cant rationalize spending 300 to. Most Popular Software TuFuse Photoacute studio Best Astrophotography Stacking Software For Sep 24. In the dialog box that appears, select the two options, Stack Images and Seamless Tones. So I'm writing this in the blind and just wondering.As if by magic the final image has everything in focus. It seems to me that if a Posts can pull out more exposure settings to begin with, it should have enough data, (although less of it), to make a final HDR photo.Īlso remember that I have very limited use on my Paint Shop Pro, (which only works with RAW photo for HDR effects anyways.), and do not own a regular HDR program. 3) Save best result as a DNG file to same folder as NEF files 4) Bring DNG file into ACR - the. Very similar to bracketing except the high and low photos will be missing some of the "outside" data.ģ Using one of the HDR programs that work with Tiff files, you merge them together. My methodology in Helicon: 1) Bring all of the NEF files into ACR and apply basic necessary settings. PhotoAcute has no parameters specific for focus stacking (with many images in a stack, it would additionally allow the doubling of resolution which I turned off). These parameters are hidden deeply down in an advanced parameter box. zerene stacker, zerene stacker price, zerene stacker vs helicon focus, zerene stacker mac. Helicon Focus required an adjustment of permissable misalignment and misrotation from 3 and 0 to much larger values. I'm sure other Posts have their way of the same thing.ġ You photograph one photo properly exposed.Ģ With that photograph you modify the high and low exposure equivalent to one or two stops each way from the origional and make a Tiff of all three photos. Zerene Stacker is a great package if focus stacking is your bag.
HDR photos are something I have only done manually in RAW using Capture One Pro's, Local Adjustment tool. Yes, but you're limited then to the range that a single exposure can capture.Ī few of the modern post edition software programs (Posts) out there can pull out three or more stops of exposure either at the upper or lower range.
0 kommentar(er)
